- Penerbit Terdaftar Anggota Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia (IKAPI)
- Nomor Anggota: 026/SMS/2024
Model dan Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri Menuju Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS
Keywords:
Model, Transformasi, Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri, Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum, Komunitas Mahasiswa Islam, TOPSISSynopsis
Synopsis
BOOK INFORMATION
Book Code :
Book Title : Model dan Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri Menuju Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS ISBN :
E-ISBN : -
Author : Dr. Peny Cahaya Azwari,M.M.,M.B.A.,Ak.CA, Dr. Fenny Purwani, M.Kom
Editor : Siti Romadoni, S.Kep.,M.Kep.,Ners
Publisher : CV. Doki Course and Training
Publication Year : 2024
Subject Areas :
Citatiton analysis : Google Scholar | Dimension |DOAJ | Others
SINOPSIS BUKU
Transformasi ini merupakan suatu perubahan penting dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Transformasi ini melibatkan berbagai aspek, termasuk hukum, keuangan, manajemen, dan akademik, yang semua memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap pengelolaan dan penyelenggaraan PTKIN
References
Anggraini, D. S., & Jaya, U. B. (2019). Eksistensi Perguruan terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Hukum, 6(September), 33–52.
Asep, H. (2006). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. UT Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Kemdikbud, D. (2003). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional No.20 Tahun 2003. 23(4), 985–986. https://doi.org/10.1671/28
M. Mukhlis, S. S. (2018). Desain Sistem Manajemen Risiko Pada Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum (PTN BH). J. Appl. Account, 3(No. 2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v3i2.875
Mendikbud, R. (2020). Permendikbud RI No. 25 Tahun 2020. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI, 48, 1–76.
UU Nomor 12. (2012). UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2012. In Peraturanbpk.go.id (Issue Kolisch 1996, pp. 49–56).
Widodo, M., Beny, W., Setiyawan, M., & Mursidah, S. (2023). JOSS : Journal of Soc ial Science EMPLOYEE RESISTANCE AND THE [ AGENT OF ] CHANGE MANAGEMENT MODEL ON THE JURIDICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PTN-BH STATUS. 2(8), 735–749.
Ashkan, Mehan; Dargi, Ahmad, E. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
Darlis, A., Lubis, M. A., Farha, M., Rahmi, R., Laoli, P., Lestari, I., & Kunci, K. (2023). Humantech Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin Indonesia Perguruan Tinggi Berbadan Hukum (Ptn-Bh). 2(3), 585–597.
Ding, L., & Zeng, Y. (2015). Evaluation of Chinese higher education by TOPSIS and IEW - The case of 68 universities belonging to the Ministry of Education in China. China Economic Review, 36, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.05.007
Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69(October 2016), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
Liu, X. B., Zhang, Y. J., Cui, W. K., Wang, L. T., & Zhu, J. M. (2021). Development assessment of higher education system based on topsis-entropy, hopfield neural network, and cobweb model. Complexity, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5520030
Masa, P., Dalam, T., Keuangan, A., Drs, P., Irianto, G., Ph, D., Kebijakan, P., Keuangan, P., Sistem, P., Keuangan, E. K., Pengelolaan, S., & Abadi, D. (n.d.). No Title.
Monalisa, P. A. K. J. (2018). TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Survey. Internastional COnfrence on Data Science and BUsiness Analytics (ICDSBA)-IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSBA.2018.00017
Murnawan. (2012). Sistem Pengambil Keputusan Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal Sistem Informasi (JSI), 4(2), 401.
Pressman, S. R. (2012). Rakayasa Perangkat Lunak Pendekatan Praktisi Edisi 7. Andi Offset.
Prihatin, T., & Retnasari, T. (2021). Implementasi Metode Topsis Dalam Sistem Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik. Ijccs, 15, No.1, 1–5.
Purwani, F. (2022). An Analytic Network Process Method Approach to Design Models of Lecturers Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i2.283
Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard ( SBSC ) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, June. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.023
Rouhani, S., Ghazanfari, M., & Jafari, M. (2012). Expert Systems with Applications Evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(3), 3764–3771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.074
Sugiyono. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatf Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Thenarasu, M., Rameshkumar, K., Rousseau, J., & Anbuudayasankar, S. P. (2022). Development and analysis of priority decision rules using MCDM approach for a flexible job shop scheduling: A simulation study. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 114(March 2021), 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102416
Togar, M. S. (1995). Pemodelan Sistem. penerbit Nindita.
Tria, P. (2020). Mengelola Citra dan Membangun Reputasi: Studi atas Peran Public Relations di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta. KAIS, Kajian Ilmu Sosial, 1, 44–55.
Utama, K. W., Hukum, F., Diponegoro, U., Soedarto, J. P., & Semarang, K. (2017). Otonomi pengelolaan sumber daya manusia ptn-bh. 1.
Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10, 2.

Downloads
Published
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.